By Aglaia Pikounis
Banker & Tradesman Reporter
Massachusetts builders and architects scored a win today when lawmakers struck a section of the state energy bill that they feared would have driven up construction costs and hurt economic development.
Legislators also removed a controversial provision opposed by Bay State Realtors that would have required homeowners to pay for an energy inspection prior to selling.
The House passed a compromise measure Thursday, following a vote by the Senate earlier in the week. Earlier this year, the House and Senate passed different versions of the energy bill, which is intended to reduce energy consumption and promote alternative energy sources.
The Senate version initially included a section that would have enabled communities to establish and enforce their own building codes on new and existing buildings in order to promote “green communities.”
The measure would have created inconsistent building standards throughout the state, critics argued. That provision was opposed by a coalition of industry groups, including the Home Builders Association of Massachusetts, Boston Society of Architects and Associated General Contractors.
“Homebuilders are pleased that the Legislature recognized the importance of a uniform state building code in Massachusetts. To have allowed communities to adopt local codes would have set construction back over 30 years and would have needlessly added costs and confusion to construction in Massachusetts,” said Benjamin Fierro, counsel for the Home Builders Association of Massachusetts.
Realtors were also pleased that lawmakers withdrew a requirement for home sellers to provide energy audits to buyers. Instead, the bill directs the Board of Registration of Home Inspectors to work with other state agencies to develop a document that outlines the procedures and benefits of a home energy audit. The documents must be presented to buyers at the time of closing.
“As we’ve stated in the past, utility companies do provide a free energy audit to any homeowner. That’s something that makes sense,” said Steve Ryan, the Massachusetts Association of Realtors’ government affairs director.
Pingback: sildenafil
Pingback: viagra prices
Pingback: tadalafil citrate liquid
Pingback: where can i buy viagra canada
Pingback: 20 mg sildenafil cost
Pingback: generic viagra online pharmacy
Pingback: cialis 10mg
Pingback: cymbalta vs.prozac
Pingback: sildenafil 20mg
Pingback: sildenafil online
Pingback: discount cialis online
Pingback: cialis orange pill
Pingback: lexapro how long
Pingback: cialis india
Pingback: how do you get cialis
Pingback: viagra online pharmacy
Pingback: viagra
Pingback: female viagra
Pingback: does atorvastatin cause constipation
Pingback: hydrochlorothiazide dosing
Pingback: duloxetine dr 60mg capsules
Pingback: herbal viagra
Pingback: cymbalta and lyrica
Pingback: seroquel price
Pingback: sertraline nursing implications
Pingback: can you take tums with omeprazole
Pingback: is fluoxetine an antidepressant
Pingback: regcialist.com
Pingback: cheapest viagra
Pingback: for hims viagra
Pingback: accredited online pharmacy schools
Pingback: how long after taking cialis can i take viagra
Pingback: viagra without a doctor prescription canada
Pingback: erfa thyroid canadian pharmacy
Pingback: best rated online pharmacy
Pingback: prescription drugs account for 25 of all healthcare related costs
Pingback: apollo pharmacy online store bangalore
Pingback: cialis for sale on amazon
Pingback: philidor rx pharmacy
Pingback: cialis for bodybuilding
Pingback: cialis paypal accepted australia
Pingback: cialis duration of action
Pingback: cialis mg strength
Pingback: viagra jokes
Pingback: viagra standard dose
Pingback: cialis paypal payment canada
Pingback: buy 36 hour cialis without prescription
Pingback: cheapest generic cialis
Pingback: pharmacy tech
Pingback: levitra bucodispersables 10 mg