By Aglaia Pikounis
Banker & Tradesman Reporter
Massachusetts builders and architects scored a win today when lawmakers struck a section of the state energy bill that they feared would have driven up construction costs and hurt economic development.
Legislators also removed a controversial provision opposed by Bay State Realtors that would have required homeowners to pay for an energy inspection prior to selling.
The House passed a compromise measure Thursday, following a vote by the Senate earlier in the week. Earlier this year, the House and Senate passed different versions of the energy bill, which is intended to reduce energy consumption and promote alternative energy sources.
The Senate version initially included a section that would have enabled communities to establish and enforce their own building codes on new and existing buildings in order to promote “green communities.”
The measure would have created inconsistent building standards throughout the state, critics argued. That provision was opposed by a coalition of industry groups, including the Home Builders Association of Massachusetts, Boston Society of Architects and Associated General Contractors.
“Homebuilders are pleased that the Legislature recognized the importance of a uniform state building code in Massachusetts. To have allowed communities to adopt local codes would have set construction back over 30 years and would have needlessly added costs and confusion to construction in Massachusetts,” said Benjamin Fierro, counsel for the Home Builders Association of Massachusetts.
Realtors were also pleased that lawmakers withdrew a requirement for home sellers to provide energy audits to buyers. Instead, the bill directs the Board of Registration of Home Inspectors to work with other state agencies to develop a document that outlines the procedures and benefits of a home energy audit. The documents must be presented to buyers at the time of closing.
“As we’ve stated in the past, utility companies do provide a free energy audit to any homeowner. That’s something that makes sense,” said Steve Ryan, the Massachusetts Association of Realtors’ government affairs director.
Pingback: ivermectin drug
Pingback: side effects viagra
Pingback: cialis after prostate surgery
Pingback: which is better viagra or cialis
Pingback: canadianmed cialis
Pingback: can a female take male viagra
Pingback: order cialis
Pingback: buy viagra online
Pingback: oem loose sex pills tadalafil china
Pingback: bingo for cash
Pingback: viagra 25mg online
Pingback: viagra sildenafil
Pingback: viagra generic
Pingback: roman viagra
Pingback: viagra cost
Pingback: viagra no prescription
Pingback: viagra connect
Pingback: instant natural viagra
Pingback: viagra otc
Pingback: natural alternatives to viagra
Pingback: viagra substitute
Pingback: hims viagra
Pingback: viagra triangle chicago
Pingback: viagra homme
Pingback: viagra alternative
Pingback: is viagra a prescription
Pingback: viagra without a doctor
Pingback: viagra alternatives
Pingback: cheap viagra online
Pingback: viagra canada
Pingback: sildenafil 20 mg
Pingback: cialis 5 mg
Pingback: viagra wiki
Pingback: viagra alternative you can buy in a drug store
Pingback: cheap cialis
Pingback: cialis mexico
Pingback: generic viagra buy
Pingback: generic viagra fred.phar
Pingback: how to dose ivermectin for humans
Pingback: ivermectin lotion (sklice)
Pingback: dose of viagra for women
Pingback: sildenafil over the counter australia
Pingback: ivermectin kills cancer
Pingback: ivermectin 6 mg tablet
Pingback: discount cialis pills
Pingback: sildenafil 100mg price canadian pharmacy
Pingback: cheap viagra online free shipping australia
Pingback: order sildenafil
Pingback: generic viagra 100mg
Pingback: cialis 5mg tadalafil