By Aglaia Pikounis
Banker & Tradesman Reporter
Massachusetts builders and architects scored a win today when lawmakers struck a section of the state energy bill that they feared would have driven up construction costs and hurt economic development.
Legislators also removed a controversial provision opposed by Bay State Realtors that would have required homeowners to pay for an energy inspection prior to selling.
The House passed a compromise measure Thursday, following a vote by the Senate earlier in the week. Earlier this year, the House and Senate passed different versions of the energy bill, which is intended to reduce energy consumption and promote alternative energy sources.
The Senate version initially included a section that would have enabled communities to establish and enforce their own building codes on new and existing buildings in order to promote “green communities.”
The measure would have created inconsistent building standards throughout the state, critics argued. That provision was opposed by a coalition of industry groups, including the Home Builders Association of Massachusetts, Boston Society of Architects and Associated General Contractors.
“Homebuilders are pleased that the Legislature recognized the importance of a uniform state building code in Massachusetts. To have allowed communities to adopt local codes would have set construction back over 30 years and would have needlessly added costs and confusion to construction in Massachusetts,” said Benjamin Fierro, counsel for the Home Builders Association of Massachusetts.
Realtors were also pleased that lawmakers withdrew a requirement for home sellers to provide energy audits to buyers. Instead, the bill directs the Board of Registration of Home Inspectors to work with other state agencies to develop a document that outlines the procedures and benefits of a home energy audit. The documents must be presented to buyers at the time of closing.
“As we’ve stated in the past, utility companies do provide a free energy audit to any homeowner. That’s something that makes sense,” said Steve Ryan, the Massachusetts Association of Realtors’ government affairs director.
Pingback: Nike Zoom Kevin Durant KD V Basketball sko Arbejdstøj til hvid blå rød 073646
Pingback: 2013 Air Jordan Retro 3 Chaussures Mens noir violet 931588
Pingback: doudoune moncler homme
Pingback: モンクレール 2014 秋冬 メンズ
Pingback: cheap uggs for sale
Pingback: kate spade outlet
Pingback: uggs outlet
Pingback: ugg boots clearance
Pingback: clearance uggs
Pingback: ugg boots outlet sale
Pingback: ugg outlet stores
Pingback: http://www.new-tube.co.uk/cheap-nike-air-max-90s-uk-p-1737.html
Pingback: http://boffclubtoday.com/
Pingback: http://www.highland-wear.co.uk/ugg-outlet-store-tinton-falls-nj-p-1105.html
Pingback: where to buy canada goose jackets online
Pingback: aire max pas cher magasin
Pingback: cheap uggs uk
Pingback: Gucci Shoes UK
Pingback: goedkope uggs online ervaringen
Pingback: SEO Company
Pingback: canada goose prix usa
Pingback: sac louis vuitton pas cher homme
Pingback: christian louboutin sale replica
Pingback: cheap uggs outlet
Pingback: louis vuitton outlet store illinois
Pingback: air max bw pas cher chine
Pingback: cheap ugg boots uk sale
Pingback: ugg boots cheapest
Pingback: nike free run
Pingback: air max bw pas cher pioneer
Pingback: moncler france echirolles
Pingback: nike free 7.0 tilbud
Pingback: vente uggs france
Pingback: louis vuitton shoes ebay
Pingback: uggs outlet nederland nl
Pingback: sac longchamp pas cher neuf bleu marine
Pingback: ugg australia pas cher com
Pingback: ugg boots in uk stores
Pingback: cheap ugg boots uk home
Pingback: uggs outlet uk sale
Pingback: canada goose jassen dames outlet
Pingback: ugg sko kijiji edmonton
Pingback: uggs uk
Pingback: ugg boots uk
Pingback: ugg boot uk
Pingback: louis vuitton outlet online
Pingback: ice cube making machine
Pingback: cheap ugg boots online
Pingback: ugg boots outlet stores
Pingback: uggs outlet sale