By Aglaia Pikounis
Banker & Tradesman Reporter
Massachusetts builders and architects scored a win today when lawmakers struck a section of the state energy bill that they feared would have driven up construction costs and hurt economic development.
Legislators also removed a controversial provision opposed by Bay State Realtors that would have required homeowners to pay for an energy inspection prior to selling.
The House passed a compromise measure Thursday, following a vote by the Senate earlier in the week. Earlier this year, the House and Senate passed different versions of the energy bill, which is intended to reduce energy consumption and promote alternative energy sources.
The Senate version initially included a section that would have enabled communities to establish and enforce their own building codes on new and existing buildings in order to promote “green communities.”
The measure would have created inconsistent building standards throughout the state, critics argued. That provision was opposed by a coalition of industry groups, including the Home Builders Association of Massachusetts, Boston Society of Architects and Associated General Contractors.
“Homebuilders are pleased that the Legislature recognized the importance of a uniform state building code in Massachusetts. To have allowed communities to adopt local codes would have set construction back over 30 years and would have needlessly added costs and confusion to construction in Massachusetts,” said Benjamin Fierro, counsel for the Home Builders Association of Massachusetts.
Realtors were also pleased that lawmakers withdrew a requirement for home sellers to provide energy audits to buyers. Instead, the bill directs the Board of Registration of Home Inspectors to work with other state agencies to develop a document that outlines the procedures and benefits of a home energy audit. The documents must be presented to buyers at the time of closing.
“As we’ve stated in the past, utility companies do provide a free energy audit to any homeowner. That’s something that makes sense,” said Steve Ryan, the Massachusetts Association of Realtors’ government affairs director.
Pingback: Louboutin Homme
Pingback: cheap jordans
Pingback: cheap jordan shoes
Pingback: gamma blue 11s
Pingback: cheap jordan shoes
Pingback: air force one
Pingback: chaussures louboutin
Pingback: buy jordan 5 raging bull
Pingback: barons 9s for sale
Pingback: jordan 4 green glow for sale
Pingback: jordan outlet
Pingback: cheap jordans
Pingback: barons 9s
Pingback: bel air 5s
Pingback: fake oakleys
Pingback: jordan gamma blue 11s
Pingback: jordan 3 retro infrared 23
Pingback: Infrared 3s
Pingback: Infrared 3s
Pingback: jordan 3 infrared 23
Pingback: jordan 3 infrared 23
Pingback: Cheap Infrared 3s
Pingback: michael kors outlet handbags
Pingback: jordan 3 infrared 23 2014
Pingback: jordan 3 retro infrared 23
Pingback: gucci handbags outlet
Pingback: Cheap Infrared 3s
Pingback: red wing shoes store
Pingback: red bottom shoes on sale
Pingback: air jordan shoes
Pingback: hermes birkin handbags
Pingback: authentic prada handbags
Pingback: isabel marant sale
Pingback: new balance 2014
Pingback: jordan 10 powder blue for sale
Pingback: nike air max heels
Pingback: coach factory outlet online
Pingback: buy jordan 6 infrared 23
Pingback: cheap nike air max 87
Pingback: cheap air max 1
Pingback: christian louboutin shoes outlet
Pingback: cheap nike free run australia
Pingback: nike free sale
Pingback: chaussure louboutin soldes
Pingback: cheap christian louboutin flats
Pingback: Adidas AdiZero Derrick Rose dominent le Basketball Shoes Mens blanc gris rouge 887468
Pingback: Grey Red Ray Ban Wayfarer 2140 2313
Pingback: Nike Air Max 2009 Shoes Mens Black Fluorescence Green 216456
Pingback: Nike Air Max 24-7 Shoes Mens Blue 51569
Pingback: Nike Air Max 2009 Shoes Mens Pinhole noir blanc 149651